[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document

To: Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>, Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document
From: Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan <rkrishnan.s@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:25:38 +0530
Cc: Dna <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>
Organization: SAMSUNG India Software Operations
References: <25db520a78.20a7825db5@pintlmail.MITL.Research.Panasonic.COM><421D5605.9010905@eng.monash.edu.au>
Reply-to: Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan <rkrishnan.s@samsung.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

Hi Brett, Satya,Greg,

<snip>
> RTR_SOLICITATION_INTERVAL could potentially slow things down if a host
> is moving rapidly between links (less than 4 sec on a link), however the
> text doesn't seem to say that "a host can never send RSs spaced closer
> RTR_SOLICITATION_INTERVAL".  The implication seems to be that when a
> host is trying to get an RA on a link, it should space its RSs by
> RTR_SOLICITATION_INTERVAL until it gets an RA and then stop.  If it
> got a hint that it had moved to a new link, it could start the whole
> process again.  At least that's my interpretation.

=> IMHO, thats quite a valid interpretation.

References:
- Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document
  - From: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>
- Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document
  - From: Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread