Re: [DNA] Scope of solutions discussion document

[Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan wrote:
> Hi Bret,
>   Just 1 comment at first look.
> 
> 
>>The basic asssumptions that we made were that:
>>- hints from layer 2 would be available to trigger router solicitations
> 
> => Shouldnt this be under section 4 in the draft instead of mentioning it in
> para 2 of section 1.
> 
Yes it should.  I noticed that it was another assumption when I was
writing my summary of the summary for the email.  :)

Thanks,
Brett.