Re: [DNA] Re: Interest in DNA or not? (Re: )

[Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>]

Dear James,

>  3) Honestly, I don't find any thing compelling in the solutions 
> because  all we have are variations of fast RA with various names such 
> as det RA, probalistic RA or stochastic RA (waiting for it ;-). RA 
> caching in light weight APs is big no. Unless, someone can prove 
> near-optimality of a pure L3 solution, you are simply advancing 
> something that will do more harm than good.

Firstly, I appreciate you voicing your opinion.  Critic is what strives 
you for better.  That said, would you please elaborate?  What is the 
reason that you see them as doing any harm in the first place?  How 
does that harm exceed the good that you see?

If you are sincere with your critic, I'd like to see you back it up.  
On the other hand, if you are just expressing your frustration about 
the silence on the list, we may expect that to change soon.  The design 
team document was submitted today, and should appear shortly.  Either 
Greg or I will announce it here as soon as it appears.

--Pekka